Patent Validity

You Can't Get Anything You Want at Alice's Restaurant

This blawg is called Alice's Restaurant, and it's about Alice, and CLS Bank, but Alice's Restaurant is not the name of the case, that's just the name of the blawg, and that's why I called the blawg Alice's Restaurant. Read More...
Comments

A Walk Down Memory Lane

It happens to the best of them. In 2007, Steve Jobs wowed us with Apple’s new device, the iPhone. On September 26, 2013, a German Court was wowed by the same video. Mr. Jobs was one of the inventors on European Patent No. EP2059868. Prior to the earliest priority date on which the German Court could rely, Mr. Jobs introduced a claimed feature of the patent -- the rubber banding effect. For instance, in the 37the minute, he showed the rubber banding effect:



Based on this disclosure, the Court invalidated the patent within the German borders. This is a good example of why inventors and patent assignees should be careful about the disclosures they make about important technologies prior to filing for patent applications.





comments powered by Disqus


Comments

A Myriad of Questions for Biofuel Patents

So you’ve heard about or read the AMP v. Myriad Genetics case. You know that the Supreme Court was asked whether “human genes are patent eligible.” You’re wondering whether it will affect the biofuel patent estates that are near and dear to your heart (or perhaps not so dear). My answer to your question is a most definite “maybe.”
Read More...
Comments

Evaluating a Company's Patent Position

In December, 2012, ExecSense, the world's largest publisher of professional webinars, eBooks & more, published my eBook, Evaluating a Company’s Patent Position. The following is the Executive Summary:

There are many reasons that patent attorneys may be asked to conduct diligence reviews of a company’s patent estate. Investors may seek to take an equity position. Banks may seek to extend loans. Other companies may seek to acquire the company, its assets, or start a joint venture. Evaluating a company’s patent position is a complex matter with many moving parts. It is much like peeling an onion where each bit of information may open up a new line of inquiry. While some parts of the process should be accomplished early, there is no strict chronological order in which the steps of the investigations unfold.

Broadly speaking, the steps in a patent diligence evaluation require multiple lines of inquiry. The attorneys investigate the company’s patent rights and the content of the underlying patent families. Also, the company’s products, services, R&D, and commercial timelines – as well as those of its competitors – must be ascertained. These should be compared with the company’s patented and pending claims. Also, the attorneys should investigate the validity and enforceability of the company’s patents and any relevant litigation. All this should be accomplished while preserving confidential information and the attorney-client privilege.

This chapter is not a do-it-yourself guide on patent diligence. There are too many complex issues and concerns about the facts, the law, confidentiality, and the attorney client privilege for anybody but a competent attorney – or team of attorneys – to tackle. Rather, I hope that the following narrative helps educate the consumers of patent diligence.

To read the whole book, you can find it at the following links:
ExecSense.com
Amazon.com




comments powered by Disqus
Comments

Publish And Perish: The Tension Between Publishing And Patenting

In re Droge serves as a cautionary reminder to those who manage the publication policies of inventors. In this case, one of the inventor’s own prior publications was used to find that the claimed invention was obvious. Thus, it is critical to manage inventor publication activities to minimize the risk of creating prior art against your own patents. Some guiding principles are provided for patent professionals or others that seek to manage publication policies. Read More...
Comments

Alice Pushes Back on Prometheus: The Continuing Saga of Patent-Eligible Methods

At the intersection of computer technology and biology, Bilski, Prometheus, and their progeny are restricting what can be claimed in U.S. Patents. The Federal Circuit, however, has pushed back against this tide of patent-ineligibility with CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Some may welcome this decision while others may struggle to harmonize seemingly conflicting case law. Read More...
Comments

Prometheus and Myriad: What can you Patent?

The Prometheus and Myriad cases are changing the landscape for biotechnology patents. Patent-eligible subject matter is in flux. Can you still claim a method for diagnosing a disease, identifying a drug candidate, or tailoring a therapeutic regimen to the needs of individual patients? What is the status of isolated DNA and protein claims? Read on for a discussion patent-eligible subject matter in the life sciences. Read More...
Comments